Журнал: ЖУРНАЛ СОЦИОЛОГИИ И СОЦИАЛЬНОЙ АНТРОПОЛОГИИ

Уханова Ю. Ю.
Феномен гражданского участия в научном дискурсе: теоретические и методологические основания исследования

Уханова Юлия Юлия
Вологодский научный центр Российской академии наук, Вологда, Россия

Полный текст

Ссылка при цитировании:

Рубрика:

Литература:

1. Adler R.P., Goggin J. (2005) What Do We Mean By «Civic Engagement»? Journal of Transformative Education, 3(3): 236–253.
2. Akermi R., Triki A. (2017) The green energy transition and civil society in Tunisia: Actions, motivations and barriers. Energy Procedia, 136: 79–84.
3. Alesina A., La Ferrara E. (2000) Participation in Heterogeneous Communities. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 115(3): 847–904.
4. Almond G., Verba S. (1963) The Civic Culture. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
5. Anggraeni M., Gupta J., Hebe J.L., Verrest M. (2019) Cost and value of stakeholders participation: A systematic literature review. Environmental Science & Policy, 101: 364–373.
6. Anosov S.S. (2018) Regional'nye usloviya social'noj aktivnosti grazhdanskih iniciativ [Regional conditions for the activity of social initiatives]. Izvestiya Irkutskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya Politologiya. Religiovedenie [The Bulletin of Irkutsk State University. Series «Political Science and Religion Studies], 23: 47–54 (in Russian).
7. Arnstein S. (1969) Lestnica grazhdanskogo uchastiya [A Ladder of Citizen Participation] Zhurnal Amerikanskogo instituta gradostroitelej [Journal of the American Institute of Urban Planners], 35(4): 216–224. [http://lithgow-schmidt.dk/sherry-arnstein/ru/ladder-of-citizen-participa... ] (accessed: 05.08.2019) (in Russian).
8. Berger B. (2009) Political Theory, Political Science and the End of Civic Engagement. Perspectives on Politics, 7(02): 335–350.
9. Blackstock K.L., Kelly G.J., Horsey B.L. (2007) Developing and applying a framework to evaluate participatory research for sustainability. Ecol. Econ., 60: 726–742.
10. Chado J., Johar F.B. (2016) Public Participation Efficiency in Traditional Cities of Developing Countries: A Perspective of Urban Development in Bida, Nigeria Procedia. Social and Behavioral Sciences, vol. 219(31): 185–192.
11. Chambers R. (2007) Who Counts? The Quiet Revolution of Participation and Numbers. IDS working paper. Brighton: Institute of Development Studies.
12. Cornwall A. (2008) Unpacking Participation: models, meanings and practices. Community Development Journal, 43(3): 269–283.
13. Dalton R.J. (2006) Citizen Politics: Public Opinion and Political Parties in Advanced Industrial Democracies. Washington: CQ Press;
14. Davis J. (1998) “Participatory” research for development projects: a comparison of the community meeting and household survey techniques. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 47(1): 73–94.
15. Ekman J., Amn? E. (2012) Political participation and civic engagement: towards a new typology. HUMAN AFFAIRS, 22: 283–300.
16. Etzioni A. (1968). Mobilization as a macro sociological conception. The British Journal of Sociology, 19(3): 243–253.
17. Etzioni A. (1968) The active s society. New York: Free Press.
18. Etzioni A. (1996) The Responsive community: a communitarian perspective. 1995 Presidential address. American Sociological Review, 61(1): 1–11.
19. Feng Z., Cramm J.M., Jin C., Twisk J. & Nieboer A.P. (2020) The longitudinal relationship between income and social participation among Chinese older people. SSM — Population Health [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssmph.2020.100636 ] (accessed: 05.04.2020).
20. Foa R.S., Mounk Y. (2017) The signs of deconsolidation. Journal of Democracy, 28(1): 5–16.
21. Galickaya E.G., Ivanova I.I., Petrenko E.S. (2014) Izmerenie cennostnyh orientacij grazhdanskogo mirovozzreniya: indeks grazhdanskogo klimata [Measuring the value orientations of the civic worldview: the civic climate index]. Sociologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological research], 2: 116–121 (in Russian).
22. Hallett C. (1987) Critical Issues In Participation Association of Community Workers, Sheffield.
23. Hassan L., Hamari J. (2020) Gameful civic engagement: A review of the literature on gamification of e-participation. Government Information Quarterly, 37(3): 1–21.
24. Holmskaya M.R. (1999) Politicheskoe uchastie kak ob"ekt issledovaniya: obzor otechestvennoj literatury [Political participation as an object of research: a review of Russian literature]. Polis. Politicheskie issledovaniya [Polis. Political Studies], 5: 170–176 (in Russian).
25. Hong Y. (2018) Resident participation in urban renewal: Focused on Sewoon Renewal Promotion Project and Kwun Tong Town Centre Project. Frontiers of Architectural Research, 7: 197–210.
26. Jho W., Jae S.K. (2015) Institutional and technological determinants of civil e-Participation: Solo or duet? Government Information Quarterly, 32(4): 488–495.
27. Kaase M., Marsh A. (1979) Political action repertory: changes over time and a new typology. In: Barnes S.H., Kaase M. (eds.) Political Action: Mass Participation in Five Western Democracies. Beverly Hills, Calif.: Sage Publications: 137–166.
28. Kaase M., Marsh A. (1979). Political Action. A Theoretical Perspective. In: Barnes S.Н., Kaase M. (eds.) Political Action: Mass Participation in Five Western Democracies. Beverly Hills, Calif.: Sage Publications: 27–56.
29. Kumar N., Raghunathan K., Arrieta A., Jilani A., Agnes R. (2019) Quisumbing Social networks, mobility, and political participation: The potential for women’s self-help groups to improve access and use of public entitlement schemes in India. World Development, 114: 28–41.
30. Levasseur M., Richard L., Gauvin L., Raymond E. (2010) Inventory and analysis of definitions of social participation found in the aging literature: Proposed taxonomy of social activities. Soc Sci Med, 71(12): 2141–2149.
31. Mersiyanova I.V., Korneeva I.E. (2017) Vliyanie doveriya na uchastie rossiyan v blagotvoritel'nosti [The impact of trust on Russians’ participation in charities]. Monitoring obshchestvennogo mneniya: Ekonomicheskie i social'nye peremeny [Monitoring of Public Opinion: Economic and Social Changes], 2: 145–159 (in Russian).
32. Milbrath L.W., La Goel M. (1977) Political Participation. How and Why People Get Involved in Politics. Chicago: RandMcNally.
33. Musch А., Streit А. (2020) (Un)intended effects of participation in sustainability science: A criteria-guided comparative case study. Environmental Science & Policy, 104: 55–66.
34. Naranjo-Zolotov M., Oliveira T., Casteleyn S., Irani Z. (2019) Continuous usage of e-participation: The role of the sense of virtual community. Government Information Quarterly, 36: 536–545.
35. Naranjo-Zolotov M., Oliveira T., Cruz-Jesus F., Martins J., Xavier N. (2019) Examining social capital and individual motivators to explain the adoption of online citizen participation. Future Generation Computer Systems, 92: 302–311.
36. Nikovskaya L.I., Skalaban I.A. (2017) Grazhdanskoe uchastie: osobennosti diskursa i tendencii real'nogo razvitiya [Civic Participation: Features of Discourse and Actual Trends of Development]. Polis. Politicheskie issledovaniya [Polis. Political Studies], 6: 43–60 (in Russian).
37. Nikovskaya L.I., Yakimets V.N. (2020) O sostoyatelnosti institutov i mexanizmov municipalnoj publichnoj politiki (na primere Respubliki Tatarstan) [On the consistency of institutions and mechanisms of municipal state policy (on the example of the Republic of Tatarstan] Vestnik Voronezhskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Istoriya. Politologiya. Sociologiya [Voronezh State University Bulletin. Series: History. Political science. Sociology], 2: 26–37 (in Russian).
38. Norris P. (2002) Democratic Phoenix: Reinventing Political Activism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
39. Okali C., Sumberg J., Farrington J. (1994) Farmer participatory research: rhetoric and reality. London: Overseas Development Institute.
40. Petukhov V.V. (2019) Grazhdanskoe uchastie v sovremennoj Rossii: vzaimodejstvie politicheskih i social'nyh praktik [Civil Participation in Contemporary Russia: Interaction of Political and Social Practices]. Sotsiologicheskiye issledovaniya [Sociological research], 12: 3–14 (in Russian).
41. Pimoljinda T., Siriprasertchok R. (2017) Failure of public participation for sustainable development: A case study of a NGO's development projects in Chonburi province Kasetsart. Journal of Social Sciences, 38(3): 331–336.
42. Polishchuk L. (2011) Ekonomicheskoe znachenie social'nogo kapitala [The economic value of social capital]. Voprosy ekonomiki [Economic Issues], 12: 46–65 (in Russian).
43. Putnam R. (1995). Bowling alone: America’s declining social capital. Journal of Democracy, 6(1): 65–78.
44. Raihani N.J. (2013) Nudge politics: efficacy and ethics. Frontiers in Psychology, 4(972): 1–4.
45. Reutov E.V. (2015) Potencial grazhdanskogo uchastiya v formirovanii regional'nogo solidarnogo obshchestva [The potential of civic participation in the formation of a regional solidarity society]. Belgorod: Epicentr (in Russian).
46. S?bo O., Rose J., Flak L.S. (2008) The shape of e-Participation: Characterizing an emerging research area. Government Information Quarterly, 25(3): 400–428.
47. Shatalova A., Tykanova E. (2018) Neformal’nyye praktiki uchastnikov publichnykh slushaniy (sluchay Sankt-Peterburga) [Informal practices of the public hearing participants (the case of Saint Petersburg)]. Zhurnal sotsiologii i sotsialnoy antropologii [The Journal of Sociology and Social Anthropology], 21(4): 63–84 (in Russian).
48. Shcherbakova I.V. (2017) Osobennosti territorii prozhivaniya kak faktor grazhdanskogo uchastiya [Territory of Residence as a Factor of Civic involvement]. Sotsiologicheskiy Zhurnal [Sociological Journal], 23(3): 64–79.
49. Skalaban I.A. (2017) Obshchestvennoe uchastie: teoriya i praktika social'nogo konstruirovaniya [Public participation: theory and social practice of design]. Novosibirsk: Novosibirskij gosudarstvennyj tekhnicheskij universitet (in Russian).
50. Skalaban I.A., Spenser S.B. (2012) Strategii obshchestvennogo uchastiya liderov formal'nyh i neformal'nyh ob"edinenij [Strategies for public participation of leaders of formal and informal associations]. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Filosofiya. Sociologiya. Politologiya [Tomsk State University Journal of Philosophy, Sociology and Political Science], 1(17): 158–170 (in Russian).
51. Sokolov A.V. (2020) Osobennosti kollektivnyh dejstvij v sovremennoj Rossii: dinamika, cifrovizaciya i rezul'taty [Features of collective action in modern Russia: dynamics, digitalization and results]. Socialnye i gumanitarnye znanija [Social and humanitarian knowledge], 6(1): 30–45 (in Russian).
52. Sokolov A.V., Frolov A.A. (2018) Usloviya grazhdanskoj aktivnosti v Yaroslavskoj oblasti: specifika municipal'nogo urovnya [Conditions for civic engagement in the Yaroslavl Region: the specifics of the municipal level]. PolitBook, 4: 85–102 (in Russian).
53. Stelzle B., Rainer J., Noennig A. (2017) Database for Participation Methods in Urban Development. Procedia Computer Science, 112: 2416–2425.
54. Stolle D., Hooghe M. (2005) Inaccurate, Exceptional, One-Sided or Irrelevant? The Debate about the Alleged Decline of Social Capital and Civic Engagement in Western Societies. British Journal of Political Science, 35: 149–167.
55. Thaler R.H., Sunstein C.R. (2003) Libertarian paternalism. American Economic Review, 93(2): 175–179.
56. Theocharis Y., Deth J. (2018) The continuous expansion of citizen participation: a new taxonomy. European Political Science, 10(1): 139–163.
57. Ukhanova Y.V. (2020) Profsoyuznye organizacii kak subyekt grazhdanskogo uchastiya (opyt Vologodskoj oblasti) [Trade union organizations as a subject of civic participation (experience of the Vologda Oblast)]. Sotsiologicheskiye issledovaniya [Sociological research], 46(1): 54–64 (in Russian).
58. Usloviya aktivizatsii grazhdanskogo uchastiya v malykh i srednikh gorodakh Rossii [Conditions for enhancing civic participation in small and medium-sized cities of Russia] (2014) Moscow: Fond «Obshchestvennoe mnenie» [http://soc.fom.ru/special/grazhdanskoe-uchastie-v-malyh-i-srednih-goroda... ] (accessed: 28.05.2020) (in Russian).
59. Verba S., Nie N.H. (1972) Participation in America: Political Democracy and Social Equality. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
60. Why M.T. (2019) E-participation systems fail: The case of Estonia's Osale.ee. Government Information Quarterly, 36(3): 546–559.
61. Yakimets V.N., Nikowskaya L.I. (2019) Grazhdanskoe uchastie, mezhsektornoe partnerstvo i internet-tekhnologii publichnoj politiki [Civil participation, Intersectoral Partnership and Internet Technologies of Public Policy] Socialnye i gumanitarnye znanija [Social and Humanitarian Knowledge], 5(3): 208–2 23 (in Russian).
62. Zadorin I.V. (2010) Vlast' i obshchestvo v Rossii: razvitie vzaimodejstviya i povyshenie effektivnosti grazhdanskogo uchastiya [Power and society in Russia: developing interaction and increasing the effectiveness of civic participation]. Moscow: Cirkon (in Russian).

Содержание выпуска

>> Содержание выпуска 2020. Том. 23. № 3.

>> Архив журнала