Журнал: Интеракция. Интервью. Интерпретация

Рождественская Е. Ю.
Надежность качественных методов и качество данных

Рождественская Елена Юрьевна
Институт социологии Российской академии наук, ИС РАН (Москва)

Полный текст

Ссылка при цитировании:

Рубрика:

Аннотация:

Литература:

• Батыгин Г. С. Обоснование научного вывода в прикладной социологии. М.: Наука, 1986.
• Девятко И. Ф. Методы социологического исследования: уч. пособие для вузов. М.: Университет, 2006.
• Bergman M. M. Reliability and Validity in Interpretative Research During the Conception of the Research Topic and Data Collection // Sozialer Sinn. 2002. № 2. P. 317–331.
• Bergman M. M., Coxon A. P. M. The Quality in Qualitative Methods // Forum: Qualitative Social Research [On-line Journal]. 2005. № 2 (6). URL: http://www.qualitative-research.net/fqstexte/2–05/05–
• –34-e.htm (accessed: 1.11.2014).
• Blaxter M. Criteria for Qualitative Research // Medical Sociology News. 2000. № 26. P. 34–37.
• Calder?n С. G. Assessing the Quality of Qualitative Health Research: Criteria, Process and Writing // Forum: Qualitative Social Research [On-line Journal]. 2009. № 2 (10). URL: http://www.qualitativeresearch.net/index.php/fqs/article/viewArticle/1294/2806 (accessed: 1.11.2014).
• Chamberlain K. Methodolatry in Qualitative Health Research // Journal of Health Psychology (Specialissue on Critical and Qualitative Approaches to Health Psychology). 2000. № 5. P. 289–296.
• Coombs C. A Theory of Data. New York: Wiley, 1964.
• Coxon A. P. M. Sorting Data: Collection and Analysis. Thousand Oakes: Sage Publications, 1999.
• Denzin N. K., Lincoln Y. S. The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications, 2005.
• Emden C., Sandelowski M. The Good, the Bad, and the Relative, part 1: Conceptions of goodness in qualitative research // International Journal of Nursing Practice. 1998. № 4. P. 206–212.
• Fielding N. The Resurgence, Legitimation and Institutionalization of Qualitative Methods [23paragraphs] // Forum: Qualitative Social Research [On-line Journal]. 2005. № 6 (2). URL: http://www.
• qualitative-research.net/fqs-texte/2–05/05–2–32-e.htm (accessed: 1.11.2014).
• Flick U. An Introduction to Qualitative Research. London, Thousand Oaks, New Delhi: Sage Publications, 2006.
• Gergen K. Social Psychology as History // Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1973. № 26. P. 309–320.
• Hammersley M. Some Reflections on Ethnography and Validity // Qualitative Studies in Education. 1992. № 5 (3). P. 195–203.
• Hammersley M., Atkinson P. Ethnography: Principles in practice. London: Routledge, 1983.
• Kirk J., Miller M. L. Reliability and Validity in Qualitative Research. London: Sage Publications, 1986.
• Lather P. Fertile Obsession: Validity after Poststructuralism // Sociological Quarterly. 1993. № 34 (4). P. 673–693.
• Lincoln Y. S., Guba E. G. Naturalistic Inquiry. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications, 1985.
• Malterud K. Qualitative Research: Standards, Challenges, and Guidelines // Lancet. 2001. № 358. P. 483–488.
• Mishler E. Validation in Inquiry-guided Research: the Role of Exemplars in Narrative Studies // Harvard Educational Review. 1990. № 60 (4). P. 415–442.
• Morse J. M., Barrett M., Mayan M., Olson K., Spiers J. Verification Strategies for Establishing Reliability and Validity in Qualitative Research // International Journal of Qualitative Methods. 2002. № 1.
• URL: http://www.ualberta.ca/~iiqm/backissues/1_2Final/html/morse.html (accessed: 1.11.2014).
• Mottier V. The Interpretive Turn: History, Memory, and Storage in Qualitative Research [21paragraphs] // Forum: Qualitative Social Research [On-line Journal]. 2005. № 6 (2). URL: http://www.
• qualitative-research.net/fqs-texte/2–05/05–2–33-e.htm (accessed: 1.11.2014).
• Sandelowski M. Rigor or Rigor Mortis: the Problem of Rigor in Qualitative Research Revisited // Advances in Nursing Science. 1993. № 16 (2). P. 1–8.
• Sandelowski M., Barroso J. Reading qualitative studies // International Journal of Qualitative Methods. 2002. № 1 (1). P. 74–108. URL: https://ejournals.library.ualberta.ca/index.php/IJQM/article/
• view/4615/3764 (accessed: 1.11.2014).
• Sandelowski M., Barroso J. Classifying the findings in qualitative studies // Qualitative Health Research. 2003. № 7. P. 905–923.
• Seale C. The Quality of Qualitative Research. London: Sage, 1999.
• Seale C. Quality in Qualitative Research // Qualitative research practice / Ed. by C. Seale, G. Gobo, J. F. Gubrium, D. Silverman. London: Sage, 2004. P. 409–419.
• Swanborn P. G. A Common Base for Quality Control Criteria in Quantitative and Qualitative Research // Quality and Quantity. 1996. № 30. P. 19–35.
• Thorne S. E. The Implications of Disciplinary Agenda on Quality Criteria for Qualitative Research // The nature of qualitative evidence / Ed. by J. M. Morse, J. M. Swanson, A. J. Kuzel. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 2001. P. 141–159.
• van Maanen J., Manning P. K., Miller M. L. Qualitative Research
• Methods Series. Newbury Park, CA: Sage, 1986.
• Whittemore R., Chase S. K., Mandle C. L. Validity in Qualitative Research // Qualitative Health Research. 2001. № 11. P. 522–537.
• Wolcott H. F. Transforming Qualitative Data. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 1994.

Сведения об авторах

Содержание выпуска

>> Содержание выпуска 2014. Том. 6. № 8.

>> Архив журнала