Журнал: Управление наукой: теория и практика

Абалкина А. А.
Как избежать журналов-клонов? Рекомендации для журналов и авторов

Абалкина Анна Александровна
Свободный университет Берлина, Берлин, Германия

Полный текст

Ссылка при цитировании:

Рубрика:

Аннотация:

Ключевые слова:

Литература:

• 1. Dadkhah, M., Maliszewski, T. and Jasi, M. (2016). Characteristics of hijacked journals and predatory publishers: our observations in the academic world. Trends in Pharmacological Sciences. Vol. 37, no. 6. P. 415–418. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tips.2016.04.002.
• 2. Memon, A. (2019). Hijacked journals: A challenge unaddressed to the developing world. Journal of the Pakistan Medical Association. Vol. 69, no. 10. P. 1413–1415.
• 3. Jalalian, M. and Dadkhah, M. (2015). The full story of 90 hijacked journals from August 2011 to June 2015. Geographica Pannonica. Vol. 19, no. 2. P. 73–87. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18421/GP19.02-06.
• 4. Abalkina, A. (2021). Detecting a network of hijacked journals by its archive. Scientometrics. Vol. 126, no. 8. P. 7123–7148. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-021-04056-0.
• 5. Abalkina, A. (2021). How hijacked journals keep fooling one of the world’s leading databases. Retraction Watch. https://retractionwatch.com/2021/05/26/how-hijackedjournals-keep-fooling-one-of-the-worlds-leading-databases/ (accessed 06.08.2021).
• 6. Al-Amr, M. (2020). How did content from a hijacked journal end up in one of the world’s most-used databases? Retraction Watch. September 1. URL: https://retractionwatch.com/2020/09/01/how-did-content-from-a-hijacked-journal-end-up-in-one-of-theworlds-most-used-databases/ (accessed 06.08.2021).
• 7. Khosravi, M. and Menon, V. (2019). Reliability of Hijacked Journal Detection Based on Scientometrics, Altmetric Tools and Web Informatics: A Case Report Using Google Scholar, Web of Science and Scopus. TechRxiv. DOI: 10.36227/techrxiv.11385849
• 8. Abalkina, A. (2021). Hijacked journals in Scopus. Preprint. ResearchGate. DOI: 10.13140/RG.2.2.21135.92328.
• 9. Abalkina, A. (2020). The case of the stolen journal. Retraction Watch. July 7. URL: https://retractionwatch.com/2020/07/07/the-case-of-the-stolen-journal/ (accessed 06.08.2021).
• 10. Butler, D. (2013). Sham journals scam authors. Nature. Vol. 495. P. 421–422. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/495421a.
• 11. Dony, C., Raskinet, M., Renaville, F., Simon, S. and Thirion, P. (2020). How reliable and useful is Cabell’s blacklist? A Data-Driven Analysis. LIBER Quarterly. Vol. 30. P. 1–38. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18352/lq.10339.
• 12. Dadkhah, M., Maliszewski, T. and Teixeira da Silva, J. A. (2016). Hijacked journals, hijacked web-sites, journal phishing, misleading metrics, and predatory publishing: actual and potential threats to academic integrity and publishing ethics. Forensic Science Medicine and Pathology. Vol. 12. P. 353–362. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12024-016-9785-x.
• 13. Bohannon, J. (2015). How to hijack a journal. Science. Vol. 350 (6263). P. 903–905. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aad7463.
• 14. Dadkhah M., Seno S. and Borchardt G. (2017). Current and potential cyber attacks on medical journals; guidelines for improving security. European Journal of Internal Medicine. Vol. 38. P. 25–29. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejim.2016.11.014.
• 15. Moussa, S. (2021). A “Trojan horse” in the reference lists: Citations to a hijacked journal in SSCI-indexed marketing journals. The Journal of Academic Librarianship. Vol. 47, is. 5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2021.102388.
• 16. Moussa, S. (2021). Journal hijacking: Challenges and potential solutions. Learned Publishing. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/leap.1412.

Сведения об авторах

Содержание выпуска

>> Содержание выпуска 2021. Том. 3. № 3.

>> Архив журнала