Журнал: Управление наукой: теория и практика

Тамбовцев В. Л.
Конкуренция: условие или барьер роста научного знания?

Тамбовцев Виталий Леонидович
МГУ им. М.В. Ломоносова, Москва, Россия

Полный текст

Ссылка при цитировании:

Рубрика:

Аннотация:

Ключевые слова:

Литература:

• 1. Merton R. K. Priorities in Scientific Discovery: A Chapter in the Sociology of the Science // American Sociological Review. 1957. Vol. 22, № 6. Р. 635–659.
• 2. Collins R. Competition and Social Control in Science: An Essay in Theory-Construction // Sociology of Education. 1968. Vol. 41, № 2. Р. 123–140.
• 3. Hull D. L. Science as a Process: An Evolutionary Account of the Social and Conceptual Development of Science. Chicago : University of Chicago Press, 1988.
• 4. Kuhn T. S. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago : University of Chicago Press, 1970.
• 5. Lakatos I. Falsification and the Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes // Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge / Ed. by I. Lakatos, A. Musgrave. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press, 1970. P. 91–196.
• 6. Hayek F. A. Der Wettbewerb als Entdeckungsver-fahren // Hayek F. A. (Ed.). Freiburger Studien. Gesammelte Werke. T?bingen : J.C.B. Mohr, 1969. P. 249–265.
• 7. Franck G. The Scientific Economy of Attention: A Novel Approach to the Collective Rationality of Science // Scientometrics. 2002. Vol. 55, № 1. Р. 3–26.
• 8. Madaus G. F. Testing as a mechanism of public policy: a brief history / G. F. Madaus, T. Kellaghan // Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development. 1993. Vol. 26, isssue 1. P. 6–10.
• 9. Davies B. Neoliberalism and Education / B. Davies, P. Bansel // International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education. 2007. Vol. 20, issue. 3. P. 247–259.
• 10. Вольчик В. В. Восхождение метрик // Теrrа Economicus. 2018. Т. 16, № 4. С. 6–16.
• 11. Аблажей А. М. Трансформации института науки в современных условиях: анализ исследовательских подходов // Идеи и идеалы. 2019. Т. 11, № 2, ч. 1. С. 44–62.
• 12. How has neoliberalism weakened science? / H. Davi, P.-Y. Modicom, J.-L. Durand, C. Eldin // Natures Sciences Soci?t?s. 2021. Vol. 29, issue 3. P. 356–359.
• 13. Schumpeter J. Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy. London and New York : Taylor & Francis, 2003. P. 81–110.
• 14. Eisenberg R. S. Patents and the Progress of Science: Exclusive Rights and Experimental Use // University of Chicago Law Review. 1989. Vol. 56, № 3. P. 1017–1086.
• 15. Sassower R. Should Anyone Care about Scientific Progress? // Philosophy of the Social Sciences. 2021. Vol. 51, № 1. Р. 58–90.
• 16. Fang F. C. Competitive Science: Is Competition Ruining Science? / F. C. Fang, A. Casadevall // American Society for Microbiology Journals. 2015. Vol. 83, № 4. Р. 1229–1233.
• 17. Лопатин В. Н. О конкуренции в сфере научной деятельности, критериях ее успешности, стимулах и рейтингах // Российское конкурентное право и экономика. 2018. № 1 (13). С. 12–31.
• 18. Максимов С. В. «Дорожная карта» развития конкуренции в сфере науки (теоретическая модель) // Российское конкурентное право и экономика. 2021. № 3 (27). С. 8–21.
• 19. Осипова Е. В. Конкуренция в науке как предмет антимонопольного регулирования (предварительные результаты эмпирического исследования) / Е. В. Осипова, Т. Г. Смирнова // Российское конкурентное право и экономика. 2019. № 4 (20). С. 22–29.
• 20. Darlington P. J. Jr. Competition, Competitive Repulsion, and Coexistence // Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA. 1972. Vol. 69, № 11. Р. 3151–3155.
• 21. Grinnell J. The Niche-Relationships of the California Thrasher // The Auk. 1917. Vol. 34, № 4. P. 427–433.
• 22. Галл Я. М. Г. Ф. Гаузе: от борьбы за существование к антибиотикам, синтез экологии и теории эволюции // Создатели современного эволюционного синтеза / Отв. ред. Э. И. Колчинский. СПб. : Нестор-История, 2012. С. 623–655.
• 23. Mead M. Introduction // М. Mead. (Ed.). Cooperation and competition among primitive peoples. New York : Transaction Publishers, 2003. Р. 1–19.
• 24. F?l?p M. Happy and Unhappy Competitors: What Makes the Difference? // Psychological Topics. 2009. Vol. 18, № 2. Р. 345–367.
• 25. Simmel G. Sociology of competition // Canadian Journal of Sociology. 2008. Vol. 33, issue 4. P. 957–978.
• 26. Burt R. S. The social structure of competition // Swedberg R. Explorations in Economic Sociology. New York : Russell Sage Foundation, 1993. P. 65–103.
• 27. Hearn J. Reframing the history of the competition concept: Neoliberalism, meritocracy, modernity // Journal of Historical Sociology. 2021. Vol. 34, № 2. Р. 375–392.
• 28. Preda A. Rivalry as a social relationship: conceptualizing the micro-foundations of competition // Distinktion: Journal of Social Theory. 2021. (in press). DOI:10.1080/1600910X.2021.1972021.
• 29. Werron T. Why do we believe in competition? A historical-sociological view of competition as an institutionalized modern imaginary // Distinktion: Journal of Social Theory. 2015. Vol. 16, issue 2. P. 186–210.
• 30. Jessop B. The course, contradictions, and consequences of extending competition as a mode of (meta-)governance: towards a sociology of competition and its limits // Distinktion: Journal of Social Theory. 2015. Vol. 16, issue 2. P. 167–185.
• 31. Gane N. Competition: A critical history of a concept // Theory, Culture & Society. 2020. Vol. 37, № 2. Р. 31–59.
• 32. Stigler G. J. Perfect Competition, Historically Contemplated // Journal of Political Economy. 1957. Vol. 65, № 1. Р. 1–17.
• 33. Ely R. T. Competition: Its Nature, Its Permanency, and Its Beneficence // Publications of the American Economic Association. 3rd Series. 1901. Vol. 2, № 1. Р. 55–70.
• 34. Stigler G. Competition // The New Palgrave: A Dictionary of Economics. Ed. by J. Eatwell, M. Milgate, P. Newman. London : Macmillan Press, 1988. Р. 531–536.
• 35. Vickers J. Concepts of Competition // Oxford Economic Papers. New Series. 1995. Vol. 47, № 1. P. 1–23.
• 36. Kolasky W. J. What Is Competition? A Comparison of U.S. and European Perspectives // Antitrust Bulletin. 2004. Vol. 49, № 1–2. P. 29–53.
• 37. Wright J. D. Antitrust, Multidimensional Competition, and Innovation: Do We Have an Antitrust-Relevant Theory of Competition Now? // Competition Policy and Patent Law under Uncertainty: Regulating Innovation. Ed. by G. A. Manne, J. D. Wright. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011. Р. 228–251.
• 38. Demsetz H. Economic, Legal, and Political Dimensions of competition. Discussion Paper 209. University of California. Los Angeles, 1981.
• 39. Listra E. The concept of competition and the objectives of competitors // Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences. 2015. Vol. 213. P. 25–30.
• 40. Hunt S. D. A General Theory of Competition: Resources, Competences, Productivity, Economic Growth. London ; New Delhi : Thousand Oaks : Sage Publications, 2000. 303 p.
• 41. Foss N. J. The Dangers and Attractions of Theoretical Eclecticism // Journal of Macromarketing. 2000. Vol. 20, № 1. P. 65–67.
• 42. Fog A. Towards a universal theory of competition and selection // Technical University of Denmark. Working paper. 2013. July 4. URL: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/245022248_Towards_a_universal_theory_of_competition_and_selection (дата обращения: 06.05.2022).
• 43. Arora-Jonsson S. Where Does Competition Come From? The role of organization / S. Arora-Jonsson, N. Brunsson, R. Hasse // Organization Theory. 2020. (in press). DOI: 10.1177/2631787719889977.
• 44. Goldreich O. On struggle and competition in scientific fields // Association for Computing Machinery (ACM) Special Interest Group on Algorithms & Computation Theory (SIGACT) News. 2012. Vol. 43, № 1. P. 43–60. DOI: 10.1145/2160649.2160666.
• 45. Rescher N. Peirce and the Economy of Research // Philosophy of Science. 1976. Vol. 43, № 1. P. 71–98.
• 46. Wible J. R. Charles Sanders Peirce’s economy of research // Journal of Economic Methodology. 1994. Vol. 1, issue 1. P. 135–160.
• 47. Lou?ek M. The economic approach to science // Prague Economic Papers. 2016. Vol. 25, № 4. P. 494–506.
• 48. Peirce C. S. Note on the Theory of the Economy of Research // Operations Research. 1967. Vol. 15, № 4. Р. 643–648.
• 49. Stigler G. The Demand and Supply of Scientific Personnel / G. Stigler, D. M. Blank. New York : National Bureau of Economic Research, 1957.
• 50. Polanyi M. The Republic of Science: Its Political and Economic Theory // Minerva. 1962. Vol. 1, issue 1. P. 54–73.
• 51. Coase R. H. The Market for Goods and the Market for Ideas // American Economic Review. 1974. Vol. 64, № 2. Р. 384–391.
• 52. Bartley W. W. Unfathomed Knowledge, Unmeasured Wealth: On Universities and the Wealth of Nations. La Salle : Open Court, 1990. 315 p.
• 53. M?ki U. Social Conditioning in Economics // Post-Popperian Methodology of Economics: Recovering Practice. Ed by N. Marchi. Boston : Kluwer, 1992. Р. 65–104.
• 54. Walstad A. Science as a Market Process // Independent Review. 2002. Vol. 7, № 1. P. 5–45.
• 55. Vanberg V. J. The ‘science-as-market’ analogy: A constitutional economics perspective // Constitutional Political Economy. 2010. Vol. 21, issue 1. P. 28–49.
• 56. Albert M. Product quality in scientific competition. Discussion Papers on Strategic Interaction 2006. Jena : Max Planck Institute of Economics, Strategic Interaction Group, 2006.
• 57. Albert M. Introduction // Scientific Competition. Ed. by M. Albert, D. Schmidtchen, S. Voigt. T?bingen : Mohr Siebeck, 2008. P. 1–10.
• 58. Brown R. S. How do firms compete in the non-market? The process of political capability building // Business and Politics. 2016. Vol. 18, issue 3. P. 263–295.
• 59. Kirzner I. M. Entrepreneurial discovery and the competitive market process: An Austrian approach // Journal of Economic Literature. 1997. Vol. 35, № 1. P. 60–85.
• 60. Lucas D. S. Non-Market Competition as a Discovery Procedure // Entrepreneurship and the Market Process. Ed. by A. John, D. W. Thomas. Cham : Palgrave Macmillan, 2021. P. 97–119.
• 61. Reif F. The Competitive World of the Pure Scientist // Science, New Series. 1961. Vol. 134, № 3494. Р. 1957–1962.
• 62. Bornmann L. What do citation counts measure? A review of studies on citing behavior / L. Bornmann, H. Daniel // Journal of Documentation. 2008. Vol. 64, № 1. Р. 45–80.
• 63. Harwood N. An interview-based study of the functions of citations in academic writing across two disciplines // Journal of Pragmatics. 2009. Vol. 41, issue 3. P. 497–518.
• 64. Measuring academic influence: Not all citations are equal / X. Zhu, P. Turney, D. Lemire, A. Vellino // Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology. 2015. Vol. 66, issue 2. P. 408–427.
• 65. Milgrom P. An Economic Approach to Influence Activities in Organizations / P. Milgrom, J. Roberts // American Journal of Sociology. 1988. Vol. 94. Supplement. P. S154–S179.
• 66. Beall J. Predatory Publishers Are Corrupting Open Access // Nature. 2012. Vol. 489, № 7415. Р. 179.
• 67. Bohannon J. Who’s Afraid of Peer Review? // Science. 2013. Vol. 342, № 6154. Р. 60–65.
• 68. Bartholomew R. E. Science for Sale: The rise of predatory journals // Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine. 2014. Vol. 107, issue 10. P. 384–385.
• 69. Whatever it takes to win: Rivalry increases unethical behavior / G. J. Kilduff, A. D. Galinsky, E. Gallo, J. J. Reade // Academy of Management Journal. 2016. Vol. 59, issue 5. P. 1508–1534.
• 70. The perverse effects of competition on scientists’ work and relationships / M. S. Anderson, E. A. Ronning, R. De Vries, B. C. Martinson // Science and Engineering Ethics. 2007. Vol. 13, issue 4. P. 437–461.
• 71. Ellemers N. Science as collaborative knowledge generation // British Journal of Social Psychology. 2021. Vol. 60, issue 1. P. 1–28.

Сведения об авторах

Содержание выпуска

>> Содержание выпуска 2022. Том. 4. № 2.

>> Архив журнала