Журнал: Интеракция. Интервью. ИнтерпретацияМихайлова О. Р.Измерение моральной паники на межличностном уровне: случай женщин-про-ана блогеров DOI: https://doi.org/10.19181/inter.2022.14.1.2. EDN: EORJMT Михайлова Оксана Рудольфовна Национальный исследовательский университет «Высшая школа экономики», Москва, Россия Полный текст Открыть текстСсылка при цитировании: Михайлова О. Р. Измерение моральной паники на межличностном уровне: случай женщин-про-ана блогеров // Интеракция. Интервью. Интерпретация. 2022. Том. 14. № 1. С. 33-57.DOI: https://doi.org/10.19181/inter.2022.14.1.2. EDN: EORJMTРубрика: Полевые исследованияАннотация: Несмотря на большое количество работ, посвященных изучению моральных паник, практически отсутствуют исследования, касающиеся анализа эффекта социального окружения в их распространении. Эта статья вносит вклад в решение данной проблемы, предлагая методологический подход, который может быть использован при изучении распространения моральных паник в ходе межиндивидуальной коммуникации. Основанный на сочетании анализа эго-сетей и биографических интервью, этот подход позволяет показать как индивидуальные взаимодействия с членами социального окружения могут воздействовать на вовлеченность человека в моральную панику. Возможности этой методологии демонстрируются на примере моральной паники относительно ожирения. Женщины про-ана блогеры рассматриваются как моральные паникеры, которые создают моральную панику вокруг избавления от «лишнего» веса. Анализ проводится на основе 50 биографических интервью и публичных онлайн дневников русскоязычных женщин, которые причисляют себя к про-ана культуре и ведут о ней блоги в социальной сети «ВКонтакте». Результаты обсуждаются в связи с исследованиями моральной паники относительно ожирения, а также литературой, посвященной изучению распространения моральных паник.Литература:Altheide D.L. Moral Panic: From Sociological Concept to Public Discourse // Crime, Media, Culture: An International Journal. 2009. Vol. 5. № 1. P. 79–99. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1741659008102063Banles C. Culture in Culture-Bound Syndromes: The Care of Anorexia Nervosa // Social Science & Medicine. 1992. Vol. 34. № 8. P. 867–884. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0277-9536(92)90256-p Bellotti E. Qualitative Methods and Visualizations in the Study of Friendship Networks // Sociological Research Online. 2016. Vol. 21. № 2. P. 198–216. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5153/sro.3936Benenson J.F. Gender Differences in Social Networks // The Journal of Early Adolescence. 1990. Vol. 10. № 4. P. 472–495. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0272431690104004 Bidart C., Charbonneau J. How to Generate Personal Networks: Issues and Tools for a Sociological Perspective // Field Methods. 2011. Vol. 23. № 3. P. 266–286. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1525822X11408513 Boero N., Pascoe C.J. Pro-anorexia Communities and Online Interaction: Bringing the Pro-Ana Body Online // Body & Society. 2012. Vol. 18. № 2. P. 27–57. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1357034X12440827 Brotsky S.R., Giles D. Inside the “Pro-ana” Community: A Covert Online Participant Observation // Eating Disorders. 2007. Vol. 15. № 2. P. 93–109. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10640260701190600 Campos P. et al. The Epidemiology of Overweight and Obesity: Public Health Crisis or Moral Panic? // International Journal of Epidemiology. 2006. Vol. 35. № 1. P. 55–60. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyi254 Cohen S. Folk Devils and Moral Panics. London: Routledge, 2011. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203828250 Crandall C.S. Prejudice Against Fat People: Ideology and Self-interest // Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1994. Vol. 66. № 5. P. 882–894. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.66.5.882 Critcher C. Moral Panic Analysis: Past, Present and Future // Sociology Compass. 2008. Vol. 2. № 4. P. 1127–1144. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9020.2008.00122.x Critcher C., Pearce J. A Missing Dimension: The Social Psychology of Moral Panics // The Ashgate Research Companion to Moral Panics. Farnham: Ashgate Publishing, 2013. P. 371–386. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315613307Crossley N. et al. Social Network Analysis for Ego-Nets: Social Network Analysis for Actor-Centred Networks. London: SAGE, 2015.Dandoy A. Towards a Bourdieusian Frame of Moral Panic Analysis: The History of a Moral Panic inside the Field of Humanitarian Aid // Theoretical Criminology. 2015. Vol. 19. № 3. P. 416–433. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1362480614553522 David M. et al. The Idea of Moral Panic – Ten Dimensions of Dispute // Crime, Media, Culture: An International Journal. 2011. Vol. 7. № 3. P. 215–228. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1741659011417601 Doba K. et al. Organization of the Narrative Components in Autobiographical Speech of Anorexic Adolescents: A Statistical and Non-Linear Dynamical Analysis // New Ideas in Psychology. 2008. Vol. 26. № 2. P. 295–308. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016%2Fj.newideapsych.2007.07.004 Eckhaus E., Ben-Hador B. Gossip and Gender Differences: A Content Analysis Approach // Journal of Gender Studies. 2019. Vol. 28. № 1. P. 97–108. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09589236.2017.1411789 Elsass H.J. et al. Moral Panic, Fear of Crime, and School Shootings: Does Location Matter? // Sociological Inquiry. 2021. Vol. 91. № 2. P. 426–454. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/soin.12407 Espindola C.R., Blay S.L. Anorexia Nervosa’s Meaning to Patients: A Qualitative Synthesis // Psychopathology. 2009. Vol. 42. № 2. P. 69–80. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1159/000203339 Falkof N. On Moral Panic: Some Directions for Further Development // Critical Sociology. 2020. Vol. 46. № 2. P. 225–239. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0896920518803698 Friedman M. Mother Blame, Fat Shame, and Moral Panic: “Obesity” and Child Welfare // Fat Studies. 2015. Vol. 4. № 1. P. 14–27. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/21604851.2014.927209 Garrett C.J. Recovery from Anorexia Nervosa: a Durkheimian Interpretation // Social Science & Medicine. 1996. Vol. 43. № 10. P. 1489–1506. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0277-9536(96)00088-3 Giordano S. Persecutors or Victims? The Moral Logic at the Heart of Eating Disorders // Health Care Analysis. 2003. Vol. 11. № 3. P. 219–228. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/b:hcan.0000005494.66782.4e Giordano S. Anorexia Nervosa and Its Moral Foundations // International Journal of Children’s Rights. 2005. Vol. 13. № 1–2. P. 149–160. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/1571818054545187 Goode E., Ben-Yehuda N. Moral Panics: Culture, Politics, and Social Construction // Annual Review of Sociology. 1994. Vol. 20. № 1. P. 149–171. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.so.20.080194.001053 Gooldin S. Being Anorexic // Medical Anthropology Quarterly. 2008. Vol. 22. № 3. P. 274–296. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1548-1387.2008.00026.X Haas S.M. et al. Communicating Thin: A Grounded Model of Online Negative Enabling Support Groups in the Pro-Anorexia Movement // New Media & Society. 2011. Vol. 13. № 1. P. 40–57. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1461444810363910 Igarashi T., Takai J., Yoshida T. Gender Differences in Social Network Development via Mobile Phone Text Messages: A Longitudinal Study // Journal of Social and Personal Relationships. 2005. Vol. 22. № 5. P. 691–713. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0265407505056492 Jones R.K. The Unsolicited Diary as a Qualitative Research Tool for Advanced Research Capacity in the Field of Health and Illness // Qualitative Health Research. 2000. Vol. 10. № 4. P. 555–567. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177%2F104973200129118543 Lazer D. et al. The Coevolution of Networks and Political Attitudes // Political Communication. 2010. Vol. 27. № 3. P. 248–274. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2010.500187 Leonidas C., dos Santos M.A. Social Support Networks and Eating Disorders: An Integrative Review of the Literature // Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment. 2014. Vol. 10. P. 915–927. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2147%2FNDT.S60735 McMillan C., Felmlee D., Osgood D.W. Peer Influence, Friend Selection, and Gender: How Network Processes Shape Adolescent Smoking, Drinking, and Delinquency // Social Networks. 2018. Vol. 55. P. 86–96. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2018.05.008 Mikhaylova O. Folk Devils or Moral Entrepreneurs? Gap Bridging in the Social Studies of Pro-ana Communities // Deviant Behavior. 2021a. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01639625.2021.1937753 Mikhaylova O. The Perspectives of Ego-Network Analysis in the Moral Panic Propagation Studies on the Interpersonal Level // Monitoring of Public Opinion: Economic and Social Changes. 2021b. Vol. 2. P. 28–47. (In Russ.) DOI: https://doi.org/10.14515/monitoring.2021.2.1818Mikhaylova O., Dokuka S. Anorexia and Young Womens’ Personal Networks: Size, Structure, and Kinship // Frontiers in Psychology. 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.848774Moessner M. et al. Analyzing Big Data in Social Media: Text and Network Analyses of an Eating Disorder Forum // International Journal of Eating Disorders. 2018. Vol. 51. № 7. P. 656–667. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/eat.22878 Monaghan L.F., Hollands R., Prtichard G. Obesity Epidemic Entrepreneurs: Types, Practices and Interests // Body & Society. 2010. Vol. 16. № 2. P. 37–71. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1357034X10364769 Monaghan L.F., Rich E., Bombak A.E. Media, “Fat Panic” and Public Pedagogy: Mapping Contested Terrain // Sociology Compass. 2019. Vol. 13. № 1. Art. e12651. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/soc4.12651 Monod S.W. Making Sense of Moral Panics: A Framework for Research. New York: Springer, 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-61821-0 O’Dougherty M. et al. Dual Conversations: Body Talk among Young Women and Their Social Contacts // Qualitative Health Research. 2011. Vol. 21. № 9. P. 1191–1204. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1049732311405804 Orsini G. Hunger Hurts, but Starving Works // The Moral Conversion to Eating Disorders. Culture, Medicine, and Psychiatry. 2017. Vol. 41. № 1. P. 111–141. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11013-016-9507-6 Pallotti F. et al. “You See Yourself like in a Mirror”: The Effects of Internet-Mediated Personal Networks on Body Image and Eating Disorders // Health Communication. 2018. Vol. 33. № 9. P. 1166–1176. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2017.1339371 Patterson M., Johnston J. Theorizing the Obesity Epidemic: Health Crisis, Moral Panic and Emerging Hybrids // Social Theory & Health. 2012. Vol. 10. № 3. P. 265–291. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/STH.2012.4 Pearce J.M., Charman E. A Social Psychological Approach to Understanding Moral Panic // Crime, Media, Culture: An International Journal. 2011. Vol. 7. № 3. P. 293–311. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1741659011417607 Ringel M.M., Ditto P.H. The Moralization of Obesity // Social Science & Medicine. 2019. Vol. 237. Art. 112399. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2019.112399 Roach E. et al. Family Food Talk, Child Eating Behavior, and Maternal Feeding Practices // Appetite. 2017. Vol. 117. P. 40–50. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2017.06.001 Rohloff A., Wright S. Moral Panic and Social Theory: Beyond the Heuristic // Current Sociology. 2010. Vol. 58. № 3. P. 403–419. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0011392110364039 Salari N. et al. Prevalence of Stress, Anxiety, Depression among the General Population during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis // Globalization and Health. 2020. Vol. 16. № 1. Art. 57. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12992-020-00589-w Schildkraut J., Elsass H.J., Stafford M.C. Could It Happen Here? Moral Panic, School Shootings, and Fear of Crime among College Students // Crime, Law and Social Change. 2015. Vol. 63. № 1–2. P. 91–110. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/S10611-015-9552-Z Shannon A., Mills J.S. Correlates, Causes, and Consequences of Fat Talk: A Review // Body Image. 2015. Vol. 15. P. 158–172. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bodyim.2015.09.003 Tubaro P., Mounier L. Sociability and Support in Online Eating Disorder Communities: Evidence from Personal Networks // Network Science. 2014. Vol. 2. № 1. P. 1–25. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/nws.2014.6 Ungar S. Moral Panic versus the Risk Society: The Implications of the Changing Sites of Social Anxiety // British Journal of Sociology. 2001. Vol. 52. № 2. P. 271–291. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00071310120044980 Vaismoradi M., Turunen H., Bondas T. Content analysis and thematic analysis: Implications for conducting a qualitative descriptive study // Nursing & health sciences. 2013. Vol. 15. № 3. P. 398–405. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/nhs.12048van Waes S., van den Bossche P. Around and Around: The Concentric Circles Method as Powerful Tool to Collect Mixed Method Network Data // Mixed Methods Approaches to Social Network Analysis / Ed. by D.E. Froehlich, M. Rehm, B.C. Rienties. London: Routledge, 2020. P. 159–174. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429056826 Victor J.S. The Sociology of Contemporary Legends: A Review of the Use of the Concept by Sociologists // Contemporary Legend. 1993. Vol. 4. P. 63–84.Сведения об авторахМихайлова Оксана Рудольфовна Национальный исследовательский университет «Высшая школа экономики», Москва, РоссияАспирантка факультета социальных наук, младший научный сотрудник Центра исследований современного детстваСодержание выпуска>> Содержание выпуска 2022. Том. 14. № 1. >> Архив журнала