Журнал: Социологический журнал

Мягков А. Ю.
Сенситивные исследования: опыт ретроспективного анализа и концептуализации

Мягков Александр Юрьевич
Ивановский государственный энергетический университет, Иваново, Россия

Полный текст

Ссылка при цитировании:

Рубрика:

Аннотация:

Литература:

• 1. Андреенкова А.В. Щепетильные вопросы в межстрановых сравнительных опросах // Социологические исследования. 2017. № 12. С. 55?64. DOI: 10.7868/S0132162517120066 EDN: ZWLWDV
• 2. Мягков А.Ю. Всегда ли респонденты говорят правду? Метаанализ зарубежных источников // Социологические исследования. 2008. № 9. C. 20–31. EDN: JSKHHD
• 3. Мягков А.Ю. Стимулирование искренности респондентов в опросных исследованиях: Вопросы методологии и методов: Монография / А.Ю. Мягков; Министерство образования и науки Российской Федерации; ФГБОУ ВО «Ивановский государственный энергетический университет имени В.И. Ленина». Иваново: ИГЭУ, 2018. — 239 с. EDN: AYOCUM
• 4. Мягков А.Ю. Нерандомизированные техники для сенситивных опросов: сравнительный анализ // Социологические исследования. 2023. № 4. С. 28–38. DOI: 10.31857/S013216250023697-9 EDN: ETIZUI
• 5. Николаев В.Г. «Золотой век» Чикагской социологии // Чикагская школа социологии: сборник переводов / Сост. и пер. В.Г. Николаев. М.: ИНИОН РАН, 2015. С. 5?17.
• 6. Barnard M. Discomforting research: Colliding moralities and looking for “truth” in a study of parental drug problem. Sociology of Health and Illness. 2005. Vol. 27. No. 1. P. 1?19. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9566.2005.00429.x
• 7. Barnett J. Sensitive questions and response effects: An evaluation. Journal of Managerial Psychology. 1998. Vol. 13. No. 1?2. P. 63?76. DOI: 10.1108/02683949810369138
• 8. Barton A.H. Asking the embarrassing question. Public Opinion Quarterly. 1958. Vol. 22. No. 1. P. 67–68.
• 9. Becker H.S. Outsiders: Studies in the Sociology of Deviance. New York: The Free Press, 1963. Accessed 13.03.2023. URL: https://monoskop.org/images/2/2b/Becker_Howard_Outsiders_Studies_In_The_Sociogy_Of_Deviance_1963.pdf
• 10. Billiet J., Loosveldt G. Improvement of the quality of responses to factual survey questions by interviewer training. Public Opinion Quarterly. 1988. Vol. 52. No. 2. P. 190?211. DOI: 10.1086/269094
• 11. Brewer J.D. Researching sensitive topics. Understanding Research for Social Policy and Practice. Ed. by S. Becker and A. Bryman. Rev. ed. Bristol: The Policy Press, 2012. P. 69?73.
• 12. Brown T.M., Fee E. Alfred C. Kinsey: A pioneer оf sex research. American Journal of Public Health. 2003. Vol. 93. No. 6. Р. 896–897. DOI: 10.2105/ajph.93.6.896
• 13. Bulmer M. The Chicago School of Sociology: Institutionalization, Diversity and the Rise of Sociological Research. Chicago: Chicago University Press, 1984. 285 p.
• 14. Campbell J.L. Ideas, politics, and public policy. Annual Review of Sociology. 2002. Vol. 28. No. 1. P. 21–38. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.soc.28.110601.141111
• 15. Condomines B., Hennequin E. Studying sensitive issues: the contributions of a mixed approach. RIMHE: Revue Interdisciplinaire Management, Homme & Entreprise. 2014–2015. Vol. 3. No. 14. P. 3?19. DOI: 10.3917/rimhe.014.0003
• 16. Dempsey L., Dowling M., Larkin P., et al. Sensitive interviewing in qualitative research. Research in Nursing & Health. 2016. Vol. 39. No. 4. P. 480?490. DOI: 10.1002/nur.21743
• 17. De Schrijver A. Sample survey on sensitive topics: Investigating respondents’ understanding and trust in alternative versions of the randomized response technique. Journal of Research Practice. 2012. Vol. 8. No. 1. Article M1. Accessed: 16.03.2023. URL: file:///C:/Users/user/Downloads/277Article%20Text-1931-5-10-20130125.pdf
• 18. Dickson-Swift V., James E.L., Liamputtong P. Undertaking Sensitive Research in the Health and Social Sciences: Managing Boundaries, Emotions and Risks. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008. xi + 154 p. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511545481
• 19. Farberow N.L. Taboo topics. N.Y.: Atherton Press, 1963. 140 p.
• 20. Finch J. It’s great to have someone to talk to: The ethics and politics of interviewing women. Social Researching: Politics, Problems, Practice. Ed. by C. Bell., H. Roberts. L.: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1984. P. 70–87. DOI: 10.4324/9781003457367-5
• 21. Fourie S., Aveyard H., Jackson D. Older adolescents participating in sensitive research: The voices we cannot hear. Journal of Clinical Nursing. 2020. Vol. 29. No. 23?24. P. 4418?4420. Accessed: 21.03.2023. DOI: 10.1111/jocn.15102
• 22. Gouldner A. For Sociology: Renewal and Critique in Sociology Today. L.: Allen Lane, 1973. 465 p.
• 23. Groves R.M. Actors and questions in telephone and personal interview surveys. Public Opinion Quarterly. 1979. Vol. 43. No. 2. P. 190?205. DOI: 10.1086/268511
• 24. Groves R.M., Cialdini R.B., Couper M.P. Understanding the decision to participate in a survey. Public Opinion Quarterly. 1992. Vol. 56. No. 4. P. 475–495. DOI: 10.1086/269338
• 25. Krause T., Wahl A. Non-сompliance with indirect questioning techniques: An aggregate and individual level validation. Survey Research Methods. 2022. Vol. 16. No. 1. P. 45?60. DOI: 10.18148/srm/2022.v16i1.7824
• 26. Krumpal I. Determinants of social desirability bias in sensitive surveys: A literature review. Quality & Quantity. 2013. Vol. 47. No. 4. P. 2025–2047. DOI 10.1007/s11135011-9640-9
• 27. Krumpal I., Voss T. Sensitive questions and trust: Explaining respondents’ behavior in randomized response surveys. SAGE Open July-September 2020. P. 1–17. DOI: 10.1177/2158244020936223
• 28. Langer R., Beckmann S. Sensitive research topics: Netnography revisited. Qualitative Market Research. 2005. Vol. 8. No. 2. Р. 189–203. DOI: 10.1108/13522750510592454
• 29. Lee R.M. Doing Research on Sensitive Topics. L.: Sage Publ., 1993. 240 p.
• 30. Lee R. Dangerous Fieldwork. L.: Sage, 1995. 86 p. DOI: 10.4135/9781412983839
• 31. Lee R.M., Renzetti C.M. Defining “sensitive” topics. American Behavioral Scientist. 1990. Vol. 33. No. 5. P. 510?528. DOI: 10.1177/0002764290033005002
• 32. Lee-Treweek G., Linkogle S. Danger in the Field. L.: Routledge, 2000. 224 p.
• 33. Lemert E.M. Social Pathology. N. Y.: Mcgraw-Hill, 1951. 459 p.
• 34. Liamputtong P. Researching the vulnerable: A guide to sensitive research methods. L.: Sage Publ., 2007. 232 p. DOI: 10.4135/9781849209861
• 35. Liamputtong P., Ezzy D. Qualitative Research Methods. 2nd ed. South Melbourne: Oxford Univ. Press, 2005. 410 p.
• 36. Liazos A. The poverty of the sociology of deviance: Nuts, sluts, and preverts. Social Problems. 1972. Vol. 20. No. 1. P. 103–120. DOI: 10.2307/799504.
• 37. Mallon S., Elliott I. What is “Sensitive” about Sensitive Research? The sensitive Researchers’ Perspective. Unpacking Sensitive Research: Epistemological and Methodological Implications. Ed. by E. Borgstrom, S. Mallon, S. Murphy. N.Y.: Tailor & Francis, 2022. P. 6–18. DOI: 10.4324/9781003252320-3
• 38. McNeeley S. Sensitive issues in surveys: Reducing refusals while increasing reliability and quality of responses to sensitive survey items. Handbook of Survey Methodology for the Social Sciences. Ed. by L. Gideon. N.Y.: Springer Science + Business Media, 2012. 377?396. DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4614-3876-2_22
• 39. Mensch B.S., Hewett P.C., Erulkar A.S. The reporting of sensitive behavior by adolescents: A methodological experiment in Kenya. Demography. 2003. Vol. 40. No. 2. P. 247–268. DOI: 10.1353/dem.2003.0017
• 40. Noland C.M. Institutional barriers to research on sensitive topics: Case of sex communication research among university students. Journal of Research Practice. 2012. Vol. 8. No. 1. P. 1?9.
• 41. O’Brien E.M., Black M.C., Carley-Baxter L.R. et al. Sensitive topics, survey nonresponse, and considerations for interviewer training. American Journal of Preventive Medicine. 2006. Vol. 31. No. 4. P. 419–426. DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2006.07.010
• 42. Sutherland D.K. “Trans enough”: Examining the boundaries of transgender-identity membership. Social Problems. 2023. Vol. 70. No. 1. P. 71–86. DOI: 10.1093/socpro/spab031
• 43. Pechenkina A.O., Bausch A.W., Skinner K.K. The pitfalls of list experiments in conflict zones. Civil Wars. 2018. Vol. 20. No. 3. P. 408–435. DOI: 10.1080/13698249.2018.1506647
• 44. Pitsch W., Emrich E. The frequency of doping in elite sport: Results of a replication study. International Review for the Sociology of Sport. 2012. Vol. 47. No. 5. P. 559–580. DOI: 10.1177/1012690211413969
• 45. Poulin M. Reporting on first sexual experience: The importance of interviewer-respondent interaction. Demographic Research. 2010. Vol. 22. No. 11. P. 237–288. DOI: 10.4054/DemRes.2010.22.11
• 46. Renzetti C., Lee R.M. Researching Sensitive Topics. Newbury Park: Sage Publ., 1993. 302 p.
• 47. Rosenfeld B., Imai К., Shapiro J.N. An empirical validation study of popular survey methodologies for sensitive questions. American Journal of Political Science. 2016. Vol. 60. No. 3. P. 783?802. DOI: 10.1111/ajps.12205
• 48. Sieber J.E., Stanley B. Ethical and professional dimensions of socially sensitive research. American Psychologist. 1988. Vol. 43. No. 1. P. 49–55. DOI: 10.1037/0003-066X.43.1.49
• 49. Tourangeau R., Yan T. Sensitive questions in surveys. Psychological Bulletin. 2007. Vol. 133. No. 5. P. 859?883. DOI: 10.1037/00332909.133.5.859
• 50. Tourangeau R., Groves R.M., Redline C.D. Sensitive topics and reluctant respondents: Demonstrating a link between nonresponse bias and measurement error. Public Opinion Quarterly. 2010. Vol. 74. No. 4. P. 413–432. DOI: 10.1093/poq/nfq004
• 51. Warner S.L. Randomized response: A survey technique for eliminating evasive answer bias. Journal of the American Statistical Association. 1965. Vol. 60. No. 309. P. 63–66. DOI: 10.1080/01621459.1965.10480775
• 52. Yan T., Curtin R., Juns M. The impact of unit nonresponse on income nonresponse. Accessed: 1.12.2022. URL: https://data.sca.isr.umich.edu/fetch-doc.php?docid=32879

Сведения об авторах

Содержание выпуска

>> Содержание выпуска 2023. Том. 29. № 3.

>> Архив журнала