Deviatko I.F., Gavrilov K.A. Causality and Blame Judgments of Negative Side Effects of Actions May Differ for Different Institutional Domains. SAGE Open. October 2020, Vol. 10, No. 4, pp. 1-13. doi:10.1177 ... Девятко И.Ф., Гаврилов К.А.Deviatko I.F., Gavrilov K.A. Causality and Blame Judgments of Negative Side Effects of Actions May Differ for Different Institutional Domains. SAGE Open. October 2020, Vol. 10, No. 4, pp. 1-13. doi:10.1177/2158244020970942ISSN 2158-2440DOI: 10.1177/2158244020970942Размещена на сайте: 15.11.20Текст статьи на сайте журнала URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/2158244020970942 (дата обращения 15.11.2020)Ссылка при цитировании:Девятко И.Ф., Гаврилов К.А. Deviatko I.F., Gavrilov K.A. Causality and Blame Judgments of Negative Side Effects of Actions May Differ for Different Institutional Domains. SAGE Open. October 2020, Vol. 10, No. 4, pp. 1-13. doi:10.1177/2158244020970942 DOI: 10.1177/2158244020970942.Deviatko I.F., Gavrilov K.A. Causality and Blame Judgments of Negative Side Effects of Actions May Differ for Different Institutional Domains. SAGE Open. October 2020, Vol. 10, No. 4, pp. 1-13. doi:10.1177/2158244020970942 DOI: 10.1177/2158244020970942.АннотацияCognitive factors are known to influence lay assessments of causality and blame for negative side effects of intentional actions but specific social determinants of such assessments remain relatively unexplored. In a full-factorial, intraindividual experiment using two blocks of analogous vignettes constructed for two particular institutional action domains (“medical” and “corporate dress code”), we tested the propositions that causality and blame judgments differ between (a) domains and depend on (b) the type of action originator; (c) the type of damage; and (d) the “remoteness” of damage from the originator. Our data demonstrate a significant difference between two institutional action domains: actors in “medical”-related vignettes are generally estimated to be more causally effective and blameworthy than actors in “dress code”–related vignettes. In addition to the pronounced main effects of institutional domain as a factor influencing cause and blame judgments, we revealed few significant interaction effects of the latter with other experimental factors used for vignettes construction.Ключевые слова: cause blame attribution type of damage institutional domain of action folk sociology Рубрики: Методология социологииСоциологияВозможно, вам будут интересны другие публикации:Девятко И. Ф., Гаврилов К. А.Обыденные суждения о причинности и вине за непреднамеренные негативные последствия действий: экспериментальный подход к оценке влияния // Обыденное и научное знание об обществе: взаимовлияния и реконфигурации: [монография] / Под ред. И.Ф. Девятко, Р.Н. Абрамова, И.В. Катерного. – Москва: Прогресс-Традиция, 2016. С. 217-231.Гаврилов К. А., Толмач А. Д.Gavrilov K.A., Tolmach A.D. Who Is to Blame? Content Analysis of Blogs about the Act of Terrorism at Domodedovo Airport. Sociological Research. 2016. Vol. 55. No. 2. Pp. 79–90.Обыденное и научное знание об обществе: взаимовлияния и реконфигурации: [монография] / Под ред. И.Ф. Девятко, Р.Н. Абрамова, И.В. Катерного. – Москва: Прогресс-Традиция, 2015. – 328 стр.Ermolaeva, Y.V. Problems of modernization of the waste management sector in Russia:expert opinions. Revista Tecnologia e Sociedade, Curitiba, v. 15, n. 35, p. 56-77, jan./abr. 2019Саганенко Г. И., Гегер А. Э., Боярский К.К., Дудина В.И., Степанова Е.Saganenko G., Geger A., Boyarsky K., Dudina V., Stepanova E. Research Technology Based on Open-Ended Questions: The Key Modules, Contribution of Software Discant // Proceedings of the 25th Conference of Open Innovations Association, FRUCT, Helsinki, Finland. 2019. № 25. С. 552-558. ? (none)