Çàâèñèìîñòü ñîöèàëüíîé ñòðóêòóðû îò ïðåäøåñòâóþùåãî ðàçâèòèÿ: “...È ñòàðûì áðåäèò íîâèçíà”? (Ðàçìûøëåíèÿ ê 25-ëåòíåìó þáèëåþ íîâîé Ðîññèè) ...



Ëàòîâ Þ.Â.
Çàâèñèìîñòü ñîöèàëüíîé ñòðóêòóðû îò ïðåäøåñòâóþùåãî ðàçâèòèÿ: “...È ñòàðûì áðåäèò íîâèçíà”? (Ðàçìûøëåíèÿ ê 25-ëåòíåìó þáèëåþ íîâîé Ðîññèè) // Îáùåñòâåííûå íàóêè è ñîâðåìåííîñòü. 2017. ¹4. Ñ. 141-152.
ISSN 0869-0499
ÐÈÍÖ: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=29674788

Ðàçìåùåíà íà ñàéòå: 10.11.17

Ïîèñêàòü ïîëíûé òåêñò íà Google Academia

Ññûëêà ïðè öèòèðîâàíèè:

Ëàòîâ Þ.Â. Çàâèñèìîñòü ñîöèàëüíîé ñòðóêòóðû îò ïðåäøåñòâóþùåãî ðàçâèòèÿ: “...È ñòàðûì áðåäèò íîâèçíà”? (Ðàçìûøëåíèÿ ê 25-ëåòíåìó þáèëåþ íîâîé Ðîññèè) // Îáùåñòâåííûå íàóêè è ñîâðåìåííîñòü. 2017. ¹4. Ñ. 141-152.
Latov Y. Path Dependence of the social Structure of the previous Development: “…the Moderns rage against the Old”? (Reflection to the 25-th anniversary of the new Russia). Social Sciences and Contemporary World. 2017. ¹4. P. 141-152.

Àííîòàöèÿ

Ïîâîäîì äëÿ îáñóæäåíèÿ èòîãîâ 25-ëåòèÿ ñîöèàëüíî-ýêîíîìè÷åñêîãî ðàçâèòèÿ ïîñòñîâåòñêîé Ðîññèè ÿâëÿåòñÿ êîëëåêòèâíàÿ ìîíîãðàôèÿ “Íîâà ëè íîâàÿ Ðîññèÿ?” ïîä ðåäàêöèåé Î. Øêàðàòàíà è Ã. ßñòðåáîâà. Åå êîíöåïòóàëüíî-ïîëåìè÷åñêèé õàðàêòåð ÿðêî çàÿâëåí â ñàìîì çàãëàâèè. Íà ýòîò âîïðîñ àâòîðû îòâå÷àþò îòðèöàòåëüíî: íåò, â íîâîé Ðîññèè ïðîäîëæàþò âîñïðîèçâîäèòüñÿ â êà÷åñòâå áàçîâûõ èíñòèòóòû âëàñòè-ñîáñòâåííîñòè, ïðî÷íî óêîðåíåííûå â ðîññèéñêîé öèâèëèçàöèè ñ XIII â. Â íîâîé êíèãå âëèÿíèå çàâèñèìîñòè îò ïðåäøåñòâóþùåãî “âîñòî÷íî-äåñïîòè÷åñêîãî” ðàçâèòèÿ ðàññìàòðèâàåòñÿ ñ òî÷êè çðåíèÿ ïîíèìàíèÿ îñîáåííîñòåé ñîöèàëüíîé ñòðóêòóðû è äèíàìèêè ñîâðåìåííîãî ðîññèéñêîãî îáùåñòâà, êîòîðîå àâòîðû íàçûâàþò íåîýòàêðàòè÷åñêèì. Îáùèé àíàëèòè÷åñêèé ðåçóëüòàò ïîëó÷èëñÿ íåîäíîçíà÷íûì. Ñ îäíîé ñòîðîíû, çàëîæåííàÿ â çàãîëîâêå êíèãè èäåÿ (ïîêàçàòü, ÷òî è ïîñëå “ñìåðòè” ÑÑÑÐ â íîâîé Ðîññèè ïðîäîëæàþò ñîõðàíÿòüñÿ ñòàðûå “ïðàâèëà èãðû”) âïîëíå ðåàëèçîâàíà: êîíöåïòóàëüíî îáîñíîâàíî âîñïðîèçâîäñòâî âëàñòè-ñîáñòâåííîñòè, ýìïèðè÷åñêè äîêàçàíî îòñóòñòâèå ðàçðûâîâ â ðàçâèòèè ìåõàíèçìîâ ñîöèàëüíîé ìîáèëüíîñòè è ñîöèàëüíîé ïîëÿðèçàöèè. Ñ äðóãîé ñòîðîíû, ñòðåìëåíèå ñîåäèíèòü êîíöåïöèþ âîñïðîèçâîäñòâà âëàñòè-ñîáñòâåííîñòè ñ ýìïèðè÷åñêèìè äàííûìè î ñîöèàëüíîé æèçíè ïîñòñîâåòñêîé Ðîññèè óäàëîñü ðåàëèçîâàòü â ñóùåñòâåííî ìåíüøåé ñòåïåíè. Â êíèãå åñòü ðÿä íîâûõ àðãóìåíòîâ â ïîëüçó òîãî, ÷òî â Ðîññèè ïî-ïðåæíåìó “ãîñóäàðñòâî ñèëüíåå, ÷åì îáùåñòâî” (ñàìûé îðèãèíàëüíûé è êðàñèâûé - êåéñ “âûáîð âðà÷åé”). Îäíàêî êîìïëåêñíîãî äîêàçàòåëüñòâà âñå æå ïîêà íåò. Ýòî ñâÿçàíî âî ìíîãîì ñ òåì, ÷òî êíèãà îñíîâàíà íà ðåçóëüòàòàõ ðàáîòû ñîöèîëîãîâ ñ “îáû÷íûìè ëþäüìè”, â ÷èñëî êîòîðûõ ïðåäñòàâèòåëè “ãîñóäàðñòâà-êëàññà” ïðàêòè÷åñêè íå ïîïàäàþò.

Êëþ÷åâûå ñëîâà:

ñîöèàëüíàÿ ñòðóêòóðà ñîöèàëüíàÿ ìîáèëüíîñòü âëàñòü-ñîáñòâåííîñòü ýòàêðàòè÷åñêîå îáùåñòâî social structure social mobility power-ownership etatcracy

Ðóáðèêè:

Ýêîíîìè÷åñêàÿ ñîöèîëîãèÿ
Èñòîðèÿ è òåîðèÿ ñîöèîëîãèè